Does Tessalon Perles Work

short guide to fascism

A passing alien asked me to give him something to read to understand what fascism was.
I thought about it a bit 'up, and I gave the Italian Constitution.
The alien looked at me a surprise: "But this is not a history book," he said.
"But it is," I said.
"No!" He continued. "What does this have? How do I know what happened during the fascist period, read your constitution? "
" 's simple, "I said," This was written by those who have survived twenty years of fascism. "
" So what? " I even asked the alien.
"So," I continued, "those who wrote the Constitution knew what fascism, and have tried to ensure that it could not happen again."
The alien looked at the Constitution with a little 'curiosity , then opened it. "Here," he said, "Says that the correspondence is inviolable, so ..."
... under fascism, the correspondence was regularly violated. "
... and says that personal freedom is inviolable, "says the alien.
... and personal freedom under fascism was at the mercy of the authorities. "
At this point, the alien shook my hand and went away satisfied.

What Church Did Justin Bieber Go To In Atlanta

Let's make a game of political fiction

Now I want to tell a story of political fiction.

say that we are in a hypothetical country, the country's Nonmai, where torture is legal. Is regulated by law, and that the police and the judiciary can use the torture during interrogation. Obviously it is governed by the laws, but you know, in the country of Nonmai laws are applied as they are applied.

Now, say the prime minister's country Nonmai uses all its power to pass a law much more restrictive than the torture itself.

What would be the reaction of the police and judiciary, in this scenario of political fiction?

"In this way, it will become impossible to prosecute crimes of terrorism and the mafia."
"You are imposing a weak point in the ongoing investigation."

etc etc etc

Gay Cruising Queens Nyc

The UN and wiretapping without

It has a certain effect on the organ printing RCS read the news UN recommends that it be withdrawn DDL on wiretapping.

Then one goes to read the press release , and does not know whether to have a laugh or get angry.

Let's see what complains Frank La Rue:

According To the current draft, anyone who is not accredited as a professional journalist can be Sentenced to Imprisonment for up to four years for recording Any communication or conversation without the consent of the Involved person, and publicizing Such information.

That is, if you log a call, or email, and make it public without the consent of those directly involved, get into trouble. This seems to me that fully reflects a constitutional right, namely that enshrined in Article 15:

The freedom and secrecy of correspondence and any other form of communication is inviolable. The limitations of these can only be done by a reasoned judicial authority with the guarantees established by law.

Well, so if I record a phone call and the public, violates the constitutional right of a person. This right is also stipulated in the International Convention of Human Rights:

1. No One Shall Be Unlawful or subjected to arbitrary interference with His privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks on Unlawful His honor and reputation.
2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the Law Against Such interference or attacks.

The Convention stipulates that even * read * must intervene to protect the privacy of a person, where there is such interference, of course, the copy that they gave to Frank La Rue, this article had been deleted.

But let's move on.

Frank La Rue says

Such a severe penalty will Seriously Undermine all individuals' right to seek and impart information in contravention of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

Now, here we go in freedom of expression, "seek and impart information", it also cites Article della Convenzione internazionale, e cioé:

Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.

Purtroppo, nella fretta della citazione è stato omesso il paragrafo 3 dell'articolo 19 della convenzione in questione:

The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:
(a) For RESPECT of the rights or reputations of others;
(b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.

That is, the freedom of expression is limited by the rights of others and the right to privacy (Article 17 of the Convention) is a law that limits Article 19. So, really I do not see the contradiction in this.

But we go on reading the statement.

La Rue Also Expressed Concern Regarding the introduction of a penalty for journalists and publishers who publish leaked the content of wiretapped materials before the beginning of a trial. "Such punishment, Including up to 30 days in jail and a penalty of up to 10,000 euros for 450,000 euros for journalists and publishers, is disproportionate to the offense. "
" These PROVISIONS May hamper the work of journalists to Undertake investigative journalism on matters of public interest, Such as corruption, given the excessive length of judicial proceedings in Italy, as Repeatedly Highlighted by the Council of Europe, "the Special Rapporteur noted.

La Rue is in agreement that there is an offense, and explains that these are 'disproportionate'. This is absurd: if I want a sentence to be effective, must have a deterrent function, otherwise, just as happens now, the publishers pay a small fine and publish the eavesdropping that can not even now publish.
Then, I do not understand what has to do with the length of processes, in this case: the intercepts remain secret until the beginning of the process. Or perhaps there is also the problem of the investigations are taking too?

Come again later.

noting the Nationwide Demonstrations by journalists and ordinary Citizens Against the draft law on 9 July 2010, the expert recommended the Government to "refrain from Adopting the draft law In Its current form, and to engage in Meaningful dialogue with all stakeholders, In Particular journalists and media Organizations, to ENSURE That Their Concerns are taken into account. "

So try to understand: at this time, the "journalist and media Organizations" are a party; they are receiving interceptions that could not be published, and publish, and publish the fact that they sell lots of copies of more. They are the ones who are still breaking the law.

"I stand ready to Provide Technical Assistance to ENSURE That the draft law is in compliance with international human rights standards on the right to freedom of expression," La Rue said. "I look forward to engaging with the Government of Italy Regarding a possible fact-finding mission in 2011 to Examine the situation of press freedom and the right to freedom of expression in Italy."

This is the most beautiful of all, not even deserve a comment.

Crips And Surenos Get Along

sad that Italy's cunning and lies

...... Yesterday I phoned the clerk of a debt collection company on behalf of Sky.
girlfriend tells me that it is the month of September 2009.
I wonder why.
I say that from April 4 of last year I left my home and not returned Viho more.

Case earthquake.

The decoder sky lies crushed under the weight of a wall collapsed.
Mutes.
then apologizes and says he will do what I have said this to the proper authorities.
Then, thoughtful, asking me if now, after a year, everything is fine.
tells me to love my city, has had the good fortune to visit a couple of years ago.
I was fascinated. I remember in particular a paved stairs leading down from the Cathedral to the Basilica of Collemaggio. And I
salt lump in the throat.
I tell her that I lived there.
She fell silent again. Then he asked me to tell what is my city now.
And I do.
The story of the old garrison. The story
I can not go to my house whenever I want.
The story, however, the thieves go there undisturbed.
The story of the buildings left there to die.
tell her that there is no money to rebuild.
And there are not any help for us to survive.
tell her that from July 1, will return to pay taxes and contributions, even if we do not work.
tell her that we will pay the the. Us and mortgages on destroyed homes.
and evenly spread the payments of loans.
Even for those who have nothing. That, in July, an earthquake with a gross salary of € 2000 will see payroll of € 734 net pay.
that not only come back to pay taxes, but will return now all those not paid by April 6.
that the state pays the homeless people who manage themselves well twenty-seven thousand, even that small contribution of 200 Euros per month which should help them pay rent. What
rents have tripled. Without any control.
What I pay in a village of five hundred souls, as Bertolaso \u200b\u200bpaid for an apartment in Via Giulia in Rome.
feel you breathing heavily. The talk of the new neighborhoods built at a price of luxury homes.
The life story of the people living there. As in hives without a soul. Without even a newspaper. Or a bar.
The story of the elderly who have been uprooted from their land.
miles away and miles.
The story of the professionals who have left. Enrollment in secondary schools in sharp decline. The story of a dying city.
And she answered, her voice trembling.
"It is possible that you do not know any of this. You can not stay that way. Call the television journalists. You tell him.
Call the press. They have to write it."

They do not write you do turn.

Mexicanas Famosas.com

A LIGHT FOR THE DIGNITY '

hold a candle BEFORE THE PREFECTURE
(Broletto courtyard)
A BRESCIA

Friday, July 9, 2010 AT 18.30

freedom and asylum for deported 250 Eritrean refugees in the Libyan desert

Stop police violence against migrants Libyan

review the agreements Italy - Libya
and stop the policy of rejections